Hi Everyone,

…..

Kept the only relevant item from your recent rant.

Here is what

**I** want to see:

1. Pick a picture or one particular movie you believe to be faked

2. Cite your

**professional experience(s), requisite qualification(s) and any and all professional certifications related to the particular field you are basing ALL of your proof on** (keep in mind that folks like Jay (and others) have not received degrees, be carry, in Jay's case in particular, legally binding certifications specific to his field(s) of endeavor. Jay (and possibly others) are qualified (and can prove it) to forensically examine photographs and photographic media and make proper, provable statements on authenticity, etc. You have yet to provide this proof of your expertise to convict ANY photographic (or other media) for Apollo as fake.

*Belief is irrelevant, only what you can ***PROVE** is accepted.3. Cite the items about that particular picture or movie you believe to be fake (use all relevant scientific methodologies to prove this)

4. Include all relevant references and all relevant mathematical calculations used to arrive at your conclusion (proof WILL include math (based on some other items that have been posted elsewhere on this board - Jay posting some of it (I have not been able to locate it, but I seem to recall Apollo (and even the JFK assassination discussion) was/were involved. So, yes, you must show your work to prove you are correct).

What I do

**not** want to see:

1. More babble around 'who might have dun it'

2. More keyboard regurgitation of long disproven theories or explanations of people you keep saying faked things (without proving they were faked)

3. Any 'evidence' without the required references and scientific investigation performed by you (using relevant professional certification(s) and experience(s))

4. Any more deviation from the question of:

*proof they were faked*anything else:

1. Will be ignored

2. Is wasted effort on your part

3. Pointless to read