Apollo Discussions > The Hoax Theory


(1/2) > >>

Conspiracists claim the blueprints were destroyed, despite they still existing as microfilm at the Marshall Space Flight Center.

But how exactly did that story appear? It seems it happened more than one time, in the 80s and then in the 90s. Who started it?

It's really not as cut and dried as that.  When you say "the blueprints," you have to be specific.  Literally tens of thousands of drawings are created as part of building a spaceship.  They don't all end up in the same place.  Some are required to accompany the spacecraft as it is conveyed officially from the contractor to its owner (NASA).  Some are required to be kept by the manufacturer until the spacecraft is decommissioned.  Still others are not strictly required, but are made by the manufacturer for their own purposes.

The perceived historical value of these documents varies, hence a difference in the need to preserve them for posterity.  And these documents are voluminous.  The space required to store them and the cost to reduce them to microform create a situation where practical concerns quickly outpace the historical preservation motive.  So some "blueprints" were indeed destroyed -- especially the ephemeral ones.  Individual fabrication records, for example, become moot as soon as the spaceship is no longer operating.  They have little technical or historical value in and of themselves.  So even though some of us would love to see them, they were not considered worthy of retention and have been destroyed as a matter of routine.

Even for those documents that have historical or technical value, they get scattered all over the country.  As I said, some are collected and retained by the agency, others are kept by the manufacturer.  Nowadays most of those manufacturers have gone through multiple reorganizations, mergers, and acquisitions.  With each generation, institutional memory of those documents -- where they are and what they represent -- gets muddied.  So when people say, "I want to see the Apollo blueprints," there's a lot of shoulder-shrugging.

Where did the accusation start?  Hard to say.  It seems that every author wants to say that "the blueprints were destroyed" and leave it at that.  Usually it's a response to confronting the reality of historical document preservation.  "The blueprints" for the lunar module, for example, were not some concise roll of papers you can just tuck under your arm.  Just the amount of written documentation that had to be sent to NASA for each individual spacecraft filled a railroad boxcar.  So the problem is really with the expectation that if the Apollo "blueprints" actually existed, they would be an easily manageable and carefully-preserved tranche.

So how much is available and accessible from the Saturn 5?


--- Quote from: Jairo on March 30, 2022, 08:57:26 AM ---So how much is available and accessible from the Saturn 5?

--- End quote ---

How long is a piece of string? Again, we have to be specific. Let's not forget that the Saturn V was made up of separate sections, often made by different companies.

So how much is available? LOTS! I have blueprints of the stages and spacecraft; overall dimensions, more complex plans showing detailed construction, how spacecraft were painted / coloured, etc. All have been commercially available. I suspect that if you want something more specific then the company that built the kit may have something in their archives but I have often found that the NASA Technical Notes or Reports are a wealth of information.

Let me try and sum up: do we have sufficient blueprints / plans / instructions to build a Saturn V from scratch (and why would we)? No - but what we have can answer most questions about the hardware / software, and we still have physical examples of the equipment. And those have been used to build spacecraft that we DO see in use today.


Thank you. That's pretty much what I expected.

The problem is trying to organize everything as a single piece, as it was conceived by parts.


[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version