Thanks.
Someone posted another link to a 'Debunking' but this one seems very harsh and unprofessional and offers no real evidence to the contrary other then we're at a 60' Tilt to the Galactic plane and not 90*. By all accounts he acknowledges the spiraling effect (which seems obvious) and that all planets orbit above the 'equatorial line'?? of the Sun, so the only thing he really disagrees on is the Use of word 'Vortex' as a description and that it's not at 90* to the Galactic plane. He appears to reference the creator as a quack because he believes there is a huge mirror in space. My thinking and knowledge does not allow me to dispel any theory based upon my lack of understanding or belief of it. To poo poo his ideas because of another he has doesn't seem like a correct way to dismiss it.
Does this seem like a fair understanding?
I need to be careful here again on how I put questions forward, so I'll endeavor to be more concise.
I appreciate the 'theories' of how the Universe came into existence; Big Bang. Not that I believe it in my infinite wisdom, but we'll leave that right here!
Can we be sure our solar system was created inside our galaxy, or can we also suggest that it was formed externally and pulled into the galaxy later fully formed? I ask this to develop a deeper understanding of the physics involved. For instance, if it was formed inside the galaxy, then we can assume as the Sun is the biggest influence within our SS, and also assuming it is also under constant gravitational influence of the galactic spin, then the Sun becomes a leading player of gravity in the locality re our SS. Can we assume the planets were forming at the same time as the Sun, or did the sun create the planets after itself was formed; gravitational mass pulled in cosmic debris to form the other planets?
I ask this to assume the sun is already moving, therefore the planets arrive later and trail the sun which is in motion. I liken it to tying to catch a bus. Traveling on the footpath, running toward the bus from the front, only for the bus to pass you as you 'sling shot' around to try and catch it from the rear. I imagine this effect of gravity to be like that of a Bat and Ball on an elastic string. For this I'm trying to understand how the planets, though on a 60* tilt could move past or more correctly, Forward of the Sun as the SS is pulled around the galaxy. as referenced in earlier posts the use of orbits and how they speed up and slow down.
OK, so, either the Sun formed externally to the galaxy, or was formed inside of it. I'm asking this as I assume because the sun has a greater mass, it is influenced more by the galactic gravity, therefore the sun moves first and the planets are under the influence of the Sun before the galaxy as the locality of the sun, though lower in overall gravity compared to the galaxy, is closer to the planets.
At a 60* title to the galactic plane, can we confirm with all certainty that some, if not all of the planets do exceed forward of the suns perpendicular centre to the GP (galactic plane)? If they do, then how is this possible? Is it the Bat and Ball on elastic effect of Orbital differences in speed that would allow the planets to move forward of the sun?
That could have probably been shorter and more to the point, but my head is firing off all at once. I'm sure I've more to ask in a clearer manner, but not right now. To add I think the model is correct. We just need to address the 60* tilt and forward accelerated motion of the planets to be in front of the leading sun.